City 'caught' on this one? 

 

The Region/City has always maintained that the pipeline bids were NOT solicited.

However, on February 16, 1999, Taggart Construction sent a letter of complaint to the National Capital Heavy Construction Association, alleging that they were being mistreated, because their bid had, in fact, been solicited.

Excerpts from the February 16th letter:    (Highlighting added)               

  "On July 3, 1998, pursuant to RMOC request for proposals, Taggart Construction Ltd., along with four other proponents, submitted a design build proposal for the above project (Munster Wastewater Treatment Facility). Our proposal consisted of a pipeline to the Regional Wastewater Collection and Disposal System."

..."With this proposal in hand, the RMOC has now stated that ou(r) proposal was unsolicited and has recommended that a conventional design and tender process, be undertaken for the project using our solution."

..."RMOC staff and CRA were well aware that we were submitting pipeline proposals and in fact we were encouraged to make our submissions."
 

 
 
 

 

 
 
  The RMOC appeared to be giving 'opposite messages', to other than their hand-picked pipeline companies:

EXCERPT from...

Letter from Thomas Cavanagh Construction Limited, to the National Capital Heavy Construction Association, dated January 11, 1999:

 

 
"The system has messed up here. The RMOC staff report on this matter dated Dec. 2, 1998 refers to two unsolicited pipeline proposals.
Why would unsolicited proposals be evaluated to the point that they be chosen as the desirable solution? Why were unsolicited proposals reviewed
at all considering that the consultant, who presumably has assisted in the evaluating the pipeline proposals, had clarified prior to the close of the RFP that they would not be considered? What can the RMOC do so that firms such as ours can now submit a competitive pipeline proposal at this time?"

 

 
 
 

GOOD QUESTIONS! 
 


BACK  |  CLOSE WINDOW