| |
The City
has squandered 4 1/2 Million
Dollars
on pipeline-related work ---since the OMB Hearing--
demonstrating an apparent contempt for the OMB,
the Public Interest, and the Law:
The City (and its consultant) disregarded rock borehole data, that was
available at the OMB Hearing. The Chair of the Hearing instructed
the engineering consultants (from both sides) to get together to
come up with a 'worked-out solution' considering the new evidence
from the Hearing.
This is the very same rock borehole evidence
(from the OMB Hearing) that is now
considered by the third consultant (R. V. Anderson) as currently rendering the
pipeline as being
too costly.
Had the City and its consultant not stonewalled,
at the OMB Hearing when
confronted with this evidence, then the third study, and all the
intervening waste of time and tax dollars could have been
avoided.
The Chair of the OMB Hearing let the City 'off-the-hook' regarding
a $1,190,000 pipeline oversight contract that it had awarded, while
the OMB Hearing was still pending. However,
the OMB Order and Decision,
did warn the City to avoid any similar activities "while an appeal
is pending."
The City appears to have disregarded the Board's
admonition, in this regard, by proceeding with over $4,500,000 in
pipeline-related work, (including the sewage hauling expenses,
necessitated by the delays), even before the OMB-ordered "third
evaluation" had made public, its findings.
|
|
Thus, including the cost of the two added years of sewage
hauling costs (at $650,000 per year), as a result of the
unnecessary Third Review, and other expenses, the City has spent
over $4.5 million
on Munster-related pipeline preparation work ---since
the OMB Hearing--- apparently anticipating a pipeline go-ahead.
Work
included:
-
$600,000-plus, (of $1,190,000 contract), for route design
work and rock profile drilling, while the OMB Hearing was
pending.
-
(The following item
is bracketed, because it is the only list item that is not
done at this time, entirely to accommodate Munster's
sewage.)
[Re-modification of Cell C of Richmond's retired
lagoons (the Conservation Area), to a full sewage works, was
carried out, including construction of new in-flow/out-flow
piping to both Cells C and B. These modifications were
designed to better handle peak flow volumes, and to be able
to recover supernatant, (leaving solids permanently behind),
in order to flush the forcemain between Richmond and Glen
Cairn during low-flow periods. (This ---permanent solids
storage use, and supernatant flushing technique--- is
the same primitive procedure that was planned for Munster.)
Munster's relevance to the $800,000-plus expenditure would
equate to whatever amount of the Richmond lagoon capacity is
required after the Munster lagoon capacity is fully tied up,
therefore, it would likely be something under 1/3, of the
total. Keep in mind that peak flows generally occur in both
villages at the same time.]
- Twinned
pipeline crossing of the Jock River, (...the one that
ruptured twice, and is no longer in use).
- Repair and clean-up
operations resulting from two subsequent ruptures of the
twinned crossing.
- Richmond pumping station
upgrades.
- Upgrading
of Fortune Street ...done without disclosing to
residents that the City had already selected their
street as the Munster pipeline route; that,
being the real reason for the
elaborate, costly, and ---for the most part--- unwanted
upgrading procedures. This was one more attempt by the City
to hide $1,000,000-plus from the total cost figure
for its outlandish Munster-Richmond pipeline scheme. (The
City's pre-selected, but still undisclosed, route for the
pipeline is: Munster Road, to Franktown Road / Perth Street,
to Fortune Street, to York Street, to the York Street
pumping station).
- A budgeted amount of
$1,350,000, for the 2003 budget, (not included in the $4.5
million total, above), is earmarked for an accelerated plan to
install a, $2,500,000-plus, booster station to handle
"Richmond" (Munster) sewage. The Secondary Plan of Richmond
shows that this was NOT
slated
to be built before 2008. However, it seems
that this accelerated plan was being announced just in
advance of the RVA report, to make it appear as though it
were an unrelated item, separate from the Munster pipeline
costing. (See Stittsville News article, December
11, 2002 issue,
page 20.) Watch to
see if this will now be taken out of the budget! What the
City does with this item will tell a lot about their
pipeline intentions. If this remains in the budget, it could
well mean that the City intends to keep defying the public
interest, and cost/safety issues, and press on with its
pipeline ...IN SPITE OF THE R.V. ANDERSON FINDINGS.
|
|
|
|
| |
Despite the horrific sums of money already spent
by the City, bypassing due process, in its attempt to ram through a
pipeline from Munster to Richmond, the roughly $4,000,000 required to
construct an onsite treatment plant, would still offer considerable
savings over the remaining $12,000,000 to $15,000,000 that would still
have to be spent, (not counting future losses in time and money over
ensuing legal battles), to complete the pipeline scheme.
Such details
would not be overlooked by future investigators of this case. |
|
___________________________________________________________________________
HOME |
BACK | SITE MAP
|
CLOSE PAGE
|