|
Officials say leak is groundwater,
Richmond residents aren't
convinced
Carly Weeks The Ottawa
Citizen
Monday, March 21, 2005
 |
|
CREDIT: Bruno
Schlumberger, The Ottawa Citizen |
|
Bruce Webster,
standing at the Franktown Road pipeline repair in
Richmond, says he believes 'all the indicators point to it
being a sewage leak,' and in any case, any leak in the
pipeline has the potential to endanger the health of
residents. |
|
It's been nearly a month since a
suspicious substance was discovered seeping into the Jock River
near the shoreline in Richmond.
City officials insist it is only
groundwater. But that explanation doesn't wash with many Richmond
residents, who say the substance, whatever it is, smells like
sulphur and is warm enough to melt a hole in the ice. Besides,
city crews have been unable to stop the leak.
Such is the state of play in the latest
episode of a 20-year history of pipeline ruptures and leaks near
the Jock River shoreline in Richmond. For area residents, this
history carries the fear that one day the ongoing sewer system
problems could jeopardize the health of people living in the area.
"All the indicators point to it being a
sewage leak," says Bruce Webster, a Richmond resident.
"They have a warning now that's telling
them they have a leak and they're ignoring it. They're waiting for
it to become a rapid rupture."
Not so, say city officials. David
McCartney, manager of wastewater and drainage services, says the
city, Ottawa Public Health and the Ministry of the Environment ran
tests on the substance that is melting a hole in the ice near the
Jock River shoreline. All tests came back negative for the
presence of E. coli bacteria, which rules out any possibility that
raw sewage is leaking into the river, Mr. McCartney says. "It is
absolutely, positively not sewage. All the people who are experts
are saying no. If it had any sewage in it, you would see E. coli."
| |
| |
The sample, which was analysed at a private laboratory, came back with an E. coli count
of 10 parts per 100 millilitres.
...Mr. Finch says that if raw sewage was
leaking directly into the water, the E. coli count would be in the
thousands. But the presence of E. coli in the group's test does
indicate the substance seeping into the river isn't completely
innocent.
|
|
|
|
|
But Friends of the Jock River, a
non-profit group, took its own water sample Feb. 27, the day the
substance was discovered in the river. The sample, which was
analysed at a private laboratory, came back with an E. coli count
of 10 parts per 100 millilitres. While that amount may not seem
high, its presence is significant, says Brian Finch, president of
the Friends of the Jock River. "You wouldn't drink it, let's put
it that way."
Mr. Finch says that if raw sewage was
leaking directly into the water, the E. coli count would be in the
thousands. But the presence of E. coli in the group's test does
indicate the substance seeping into the river isn't completely
innocent.
Mr. McCartney, however, maintains that the
substance is merely groundwater flowing downstream and is the
result of a pipeline leak.
Residents who reported a strong odour like
raw sewage near the site where the substance was seeping into the
river were actually smelling sulphur, Mr. McCartney says. The
water originated in the middle of a flood plain, the surface of a
strip of relatively smooth land located next to a river channel,
and soaked in rotting vegetation, thus creating a sulphuric odour.
Residents have jumped to the conclusion
that only raw sewage could have melted a large hole in ice half a
metre thick, Mr. McCartney says. When there's a constant flow of
ground water that's warmer than the ice, it will eventually cause
the ice to melt.
But Mr. Finch says there is no record of a
source from which groundwater could have come. "There's no reason
for me to believe that it is groundwater because there's no record
of springs in that area. It has to come from some source," he
insists.
| |
| |
"Groundwater is not normally as warm as this is. This
is the first instance of any groundwater leaking to
the surface in the Richmond area and the leak is
directly above the sewer pipes," Mr. Webster says. "If
you're a gambler, what would you gamble on?"
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Finch and other concerned Richmond
residents don't buy the city's explanations. Since the sewage
pipeline was installed in 1984, they say there have been six
breaks.
The city has three pipeline breaks on its
record books: Oct. 26, 2004, Dec. 19, 2001 and June 19, 2002. The
other three incidents that Mr. Finch classifies as pipeline breaks
were problems with the pipeline, not actual ruptures, according to
Mr. McCartney.
While the city can divert the sewage into
an emergency lagoon in such cases, Mr. Finch says Richmond's sewer
system is fragile. He says a lot of groundwater infiltrates the
pipeline and is taxing on the system. "There's lots of effluent
that gets into the pipeline that the pipe has to have the capacity
to deal with."
Mr. Finch also believes the problems are
being exacerbated by a new force main that's being installed from
Munster to Richmond. That new main, he says, will put additional
pressure on the already-strained sewer system.
In any case, Mr. Webster says any leak in
the pipeline currently serving Richmond residents has the
potential to endanger their health.
Since Richmond uses an aquifer, an
underground system that is a source of groundwater for wells, the
system can easily become contaminated if pipelines break or leak
small amounts of sewage.
He, like Mr. Finch, doesn't buy the city's
explanation that the substance leaking into the Jock River is
groundwater from a flood plain. "Groundwater is not normally as
warm as this is. This is the first instance of any groundwater
leaking to the surface in the Richmond area and the leak is
directly above the sewer pipes," Mr. Webster says. "If you're a
gambler, what would you gamble on?"
What's Seeping Into the Jock River?
© The Ottawa Citizen 2005
|