Petition Letter    

To Bob Chiarelli, Chair, Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton      

February 23, 1998 (Re: Munster Wastewater Facility)                

 
 


For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned Residents of Munster
Hamlet and surrounding area request your urgent attention to their
requests, regarding the matter of determining the best possible,
permanent solution for the treatment of Munster wastewater
---that is safe to both the environment and to public health.

 
 

   

WHEREAS several independent engineering firms have publicly stated that the Environmental Study Report (ESR), by Totten Simms Hubicki, is seriously in error in many respects (both factually, and in its conclusions);


AND WHEREAS several independent engineering firms have publicly stated that the planned expansion of the Munster sewage lagoons and the spray irrigation field is seriously flawed in several respects, (being little more than a costly expansion of the existing problem of discharging contaminated sewage effluent into the Jock River);


AND WHEREAS
and whenever the evaluation of one or more of the options considered in an ESR is found inaccurate or incomplete, there is provision under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) to have the ESR amended to properly consider same …as is in the case of the subject-ESR: Volume 1, Section 4.3.12, page 54, re: "Sewage Treatment Plant";


AND WHEREAS
the Ministry of Environment (MOE), under the EPA has also stated that when there is newer advanced technology available, that was not known at the time the ESR was written, there is provision under the act to amend the ESR, to include such technologies for consideration;


AND WHEREAS
in the best interests of the residents of Munster, Mayor Janet Stavinga of Goulbourn has requested of Regional Chair, Bob Chiarelli, "With this additional knowledge, I strongly encourage the Region to seek amendments to the EA (Environmental Assessment) process to allow full disclosure and consideration of these other options";


AND WHEREAS
the quoted cost for the more advanced technologies appears to be approximately 50% of the cost of the Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton’s (R.M.O.C.’s) ESR-selected project ($3,000,000 as opposed to $7,000,000), at a time when provincial cutbacks necessitate avoidance of wasteful spending;


AND WHEREAS
the RMOC’s Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee, on Tuesday, February17, 1998, passed a decision to purchase one of the smaller properties involved in the ESR-selected project (spending more than its entire land-acquisition budget of $200,000, as quoted in the ESR);


AND WHEREAS
none of the new advanced technologies requires any extra land purchases;


AND WHEREAS
the stated time-frame (by the Region) for completion of the ESR-selected project is 2 years (end of 1999), while the advanced, less-expensive technologies can be up-and-running in 1 year or less;


AND WHEREAS
the time-frame for the various stages of application to amend the ESR …to include these advanced systems for evaluation would be less time than that required for needless land acquisition;


NOW THEREFORE
, it is the solemn and urgent request of the undersigned Munster and area residents, that an amendment to the existing Totten Simms Hubicki-ESR be proceeded with in all haste,

to include adequate evaluation of the advanced
"treatment" technologies now before the Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton.

February 23, 1998 (Re: Munster Wastewater Facility – L 104)

 

 

(Highlighting and emphasis added.)


474 SIGNATURES - NAMES - ADDRESSES - followed


Follow-up notes:

(February 23, 1998)

In a 24-hour period, a team of 6 Munster and area residents had circulated the Petition through the area.

In that short period, 474 residents, representing almost 100% of the residents who could be reached at the time, signed the Petition. (Only 2 residents declined.)

Aside from indicating (by signing the Petition) their strong desire for an evaluation of  "advanced treatment technologies" (see last paragraph of Petition), two other opinions were strongly voiced to the canvassers at the doors. These were:
"Get rid of the Lagoons"
, and "Get the problem solved quickly".


Results of Petition:  CLICK HERE

 
 

___________________________________________________________________________

 CLOSE PAGE