The flyer states: "...a pipeline for Munster would eliminate many of the negative environmental impacts associated with a local treatment system, including odour, noise and loss of agricultural land."  ...an example of more misrepresentation!
 

  1. The flyer's statement treats all of the different local treatment systems as one. The reader knows that there are two distinct systems. The RBC-Mechanical Treatment Plant (MTP) has virtually non-existent odours (because it operates indoors, and does not use lagoons), compared with the pipeline and its associated lagoon(s).

  2. The RBC-MTP's 5-HP motors operating at a distance of about 1500-feet from the Munster pump station, should produce a lot less noise and vibration than the existing 10-HP pumps, operating adjacent to homes on Dogwood Drive. (You know: inverse square of the distance, and all that stuff.) However, since it appears that the pipeline the City's consultants would recommend is 10-inches (250 mm) in diameter, then the adjacent pump motors at the pump house would have to be 88-HP. (Pipeline proponents ....Enjoy!)

  3. The RBC-MTP has a generous home-sized footprint of about 3500 square feet ---THAT'S ALL! It actually frees up land (currently tied up), for future agricultural, conservation or recreational use. The pipeline, on the other hand, severely disrupts (during construction) ---and permanently ties up--- over 7-hectares of valuable road corridor. That entire route is, thereafter, forever at risk of the all-too-familiar pattern of forcemain ruptures.