| |
The City should remove
the unwanted lagoons for cost and health reasons.
Update:
April 4, 2003:
Because of
the City's reluctance to candidly disclose the politically sensitive
matter: that the pipeline option requires continuous lagoon use, the public
has been kept in the dark regarding the fate of these open,
mosquito-breeding, cesspools on Munster's doorstep.
The Number
One Issue for Munster from Day-one was:
ELIMINATE THE HATED
LAGOONS!
Now
there's a new threat:
West Nile Virus
The need for Munster residents to
have all of the lagoons removed, is made much
more pressing, due to the encroachment of the West Nile virus. The
virus is particularly worrisome for protectors of the young, of
seniors, and of all others with health challenges or compromised
immune systems.
The most important, officially
recommended, protection measure for property owners, (individual or
municipal), is to remove all stagnant pools of water in the vicinity of private yards, school playgrounds and other outdoor activity
areas.
Insecticide spraying would only add to both the cost and and the
risks. Munster and area residents are now expressing even stronger feelings
that the City should be taking swift measures to remove the presence
of the old sewage lagoons, because of their mosquito-breeding capability and because they are in much-too-close
proximity to our community.
It is imperative that City staff
and politicians ensure that the most vulnerable in our society are not left as
victims of a bizarre game of Russian roulette.
Of the three treatment options
left on the table, the snowmaking option requires lagoons, the
pipeline option requires lagoons, and the mechanical treatment
option does not require lagoons.
Residents are asking: "Of the
1998 search for
'new and innovative treatment technologies', that was the subject of the City's (RMOC's)
Industry 'Request for Proposals' process: Which of the current
options would clearly provide the lowest overall risk to residents of
Munster, Rural Richmond, and Richmond Village (?)... a.)
a snow-making process that requires mosquito-breeding lagoons, and a
spray
field? b.) a
pressurized pipeline (with a
history of rupturing), that
requires mosquito-breeding lagoons to function, with an (H2S-producing) 11 km. span
past 140
private shallow wells, at
a cost that is five times more than anything else, or,
c.) an innovative and respected high performance mechanical
treatment plant, made up of a
combination of proven technologies,
the individual elements of which have given years-upon-years of reliable service,
is operated entirely indoors and does not need
mosquito-breeding lagoons, and
has the lowest capital, operation and maintenance costs?"
Even after three out
of the four engineering consulting firms, hired by the
municipality, have recommended AGAINST the pipeline option, the City is still trying to manipulate the selection of a
pipeline. (The City has just re-hired R.V. Anderson, February
28, 2003, ---for another $50,000--- in a last-ditch attempt to get
R.V. Anderson to reverse its December 16, 2002, $179,000 Study
---that recommended elimination of the pipeline option).
The City has followed a very
slippery slope in its pursuit of a pipeline-lagoon configuration for
Munster. Such a course, if continued, is certain to cause further
redress at the OMB (e.g.: under Section 43), and in the courts
...adding to more delays, more sewage trucking, and extended risks.
There is something morally bankrupt (and depictive of bad faith dealings), when
City officials (staff and politicians) put out a tender call (in the
form of a Request for Proposals) for
"new and innovative wastewater
treatment technologies", then use that single fact of its
"newness", as the attempted means to disqualify it ...even when the
individual elements of the technology are time-tested, and known to
be superior, on their own.
The Council of the City of Ottawa
has a fast-closing window of opportunity to make things right: to
make a decision that is both fair and honest, that is nurturing to
the environment, that protects the groundwater serving 140 private shallow wells of rural
and Richmond residents, and now: by removing the lagoons, can offer
Munster an added
level of protection from an otherwise elevated risk of West Nile
virus.
Let's hope that integrity and reason will
prevail with the
individual
members of Council, in this matter, which ---due to the entry of the
West Nile Virus--- could now become a matter of "life-or-death"
importance to certain residents.
West Nile Virus - An epidemic of coverups and intruths
Ontario
kept west nile cases secret: Made epidemic worse
MDs alerted to West Nile
paralysis - Risk of polio-like symptoms higher than most realized:
study Other Links to West Nile Virus information - Courtesy of The Ottawa
Citizen/Canada.com
Quote from :
Time to fight West Nile virus
| The Ottawa
Citizen - Thursday, April 10, 2003 |
"Reducing the
mosquito population is the main answer. The biggest and clumsiest weapon
against the mosquito population is spraying or "fogging" of Malathion
insecticide to kill adult mosquitoes. The trouble with this technique is that
it kills all kinds of insects, must be done repeatedly, and -- even if some
federal government scientists insist that it's perfectly safe -- causes
breathing problems for many people. As the City of Ottawa's debate over
pesticides made clear, there are many Ottawa residents who have environmental
sensitivities, and become very ill when pesticides are sprayed.
A better tactic is prevention. Start a
city-wide campaign to eliminate standing pools of stagnant water: whether they
be in the thousands of swimming pool covers (just open the pool early,) a pool
of stagnant water in a birdbath or any pool of water that accumulates on a
piece of outdoor furniture."
Update: July 10,
2004:
| |
Does anyone at City Hall really care?
West Nile-suspect crow
found dead at roadside adjacent to Munster lagoons.
City lagoon attendants
repeatedly passed dead crow for two days without reporting it to
West Nile bird collection staff.
|
July 10, 2004
“Typical city
efficiency”: Create the lagoon conditions that
harbour West Nile
mosquito proliferation, then when the city-caused conditions
produce a suspect WN-positive, dead bird at the high-risk,
city-owned site …simply ignore it.
One wonders,
“how many dead crows are lying around within the fenced
portion of the 13 Hectare, city-owned lagoon property?”
The city’s
website states the following:
|
|

Dead crow, suspected of
harbouring West Nile virus, was ignored by city staff for two
days. Finally, a local resident reported it to city.
|
| |
Another important part of the surveillance
program rests with the public. If you find an
adult dead crow, phone the City of Ottawa at 613-724-4122
ext. 26138. Please leave your name and number. Someone will
call you back about the specific details. In most cases, pick up
will be by the following day. Dead adult crows can be an indicator
that the virus has reached the area because crows are the most
susceptible to the virus. |
|
|
|
|
(or presumably inspected) the
sewage effluent run-off volumes discharging to the Copeland
Road ditch ...then pouring into the nearby Jock River, as daily over-spraying
continues.
After waiting two days for city staff to do
their civic duty by collecting the crow for testing, or at least
reporting it, a local resident did just that. The pick up request
was filed at the city’s
|
The dead crow was left at
the edge of Copeland Road, in the area immediately adjacent to
the city’s sewage lagoon property, while city staff drove by
it two or three times daily, as they inspected |
|
telephone answering line at
10:30 a.m., Saturday, July 9th, 2004.
What happens next will be reported on this webpage.
|
Incidents, such as this, keep
reminding us just how disinterested (or
incompetent) some city officials (and other government agencies)
can be, concerning the protection of our health.
-
The lagoons could
have been eliminated ---altogether--- by selecting the less-expensive, on-site,
mechanical treatment system for Munster ---that does not require
lagoons. (The forcemain scheme requires
year-round lagoon use, in order to barely function over such a
distance.)
-
The rural residents,
and Richmond residents who depend on shallow wells for their
drinking water would not have to worry about their family-safety,
if someone cared enough at City Hall, to avoid putting a sewage
forcemain through their acquifer.
-
What is the Mayor up
to, in all of this? (http://www.ottawasewergatefiasco.com/chiarelli-lk-031028.htm)
-
Where is the ward
councillor? Why is she conspiring with the Mayor, instead of doing
her job: protecting her constituents' interests?
-
Where is the Chief
Medical Officer, who is supposed to protect the health of Ottawa
residents? (http://www.ottawasewergatefiasco.com/cushman-031216.htm)
...and,
beyond the city:
-
Where is the MOE,
who is supposed to take the final and ultimate responsibility for "water source
protection" ... if it is worth anything at all. How many Walkertons
does it take, to wake up the Ministry to its responsibility?
|
|
|
|