|
|
TONY BOCK/TORONTO STAR |
|
Ducks puddle in warm groundwater pouring from York
Region drainage pipes north of 16th Ave., west of
Highway 48. Critics fear the 10C water will hurt the
ecosystem. |
|
Close-up: The Big Pipe
York Region's sewer plans have been dogged by controversy from
the beginning. Now, with water tables dropping, opponents want
it plugged.
Fearing the construction of York Region's "Big Pipe" will
bleed streams dry and destroy fish habitats, environmentalists
are demanding the new sewer be plugged up before another inch
is built.
They insist the $800-million project needs a full
environmental assessment to determine the true impact of
pumping billions of litres of water from the ground to lay the
sewer.
"York Region is sucking water out of Oak Ridges Moraine
aquifers, drying tributaries that feed the Rouge River and
killing fish to make way for more development and urban
sprawl," warns environmental lobbyist Jim Robb, with the Rouge
Duffin Greenspace Coalition.
"It's happening because the region hasn't properly assessed
the impact of construction on the environment or come up with
ways to mitigate problems."
Regional officials readily admit the problem.
"We underestimated the extent of the impact to groundwater
in the area," says Paul Jankowski, manager of design and
construction at York's transportation and works department.
But York Region is confident it can be fixed. Officials say
they have come up with new plans that will safeguard natural
resources and get construction of the new York Durham Sewer
System back on track.
Recommendations are expected to be tabled in the next few
weeks.
King Township Mayor Margaret Black, a major supporter of
the new sewer line, maintains a full environmental study isn't
necessary.
Black says interest groups made three applications for full
assessments and King council made one in 2000, but the
minister of the environment "said there was no need for a full
environmental assessment, that everything had been done
properly."
The stakes are huge. New subdivisions have been approved
reflecting the region's commitment to having the pipe in the
ground by 2006. Halting construction for a full environmental
assessment would be a legal nightmare. About 80 per cent of
the line's cost will be paid through development levies.
The huge, gravity-fed sewer, which will stretch from the
east side of Lake Simcoe to Lake Ontario, is being built to
serve one of the fastest-growing regions in the country. With
huge growth in York Region in recent years, the population is
expected to almost double to 1.3 million by 2026.
The existing system, which was built in the 1970s under
Yonge St. and serves Vaughan, Markham, Richmond Hill, Aurora
and Newmarket, is pretty much at capacity. A new twin sewer,
under Leslie St., is needed to accommodate emerging
subdivisons and industries north to Holland Landing. Rural
communities like King City and Whitchurch-Stouffville will
also hook in.
When it's built, the Big Pipe will move up to 740 million
litres of raw sewage each day to the Pickering treatment plant
on Lake Ontario.
Robb is furious that work was allowed to proceed based on
what he says were "superficial and fragmented" studies that
examined small sections in isolation, instead of the big
picture.
And if early problems are any indication of what's ahead,
the environment is in big trouble, he predicts.
The region began construction of trunk sewer in Markham in
2000. About 4 kilometres have been built south of Highway 407
in Box Grove, along 9th Line to Major Mackenzie Dr.
Eventually, the sewer will be extended to
Whitchurch-Stouffville. Another 2.5 kilometres runs along 16th
Ave., ending at Stone Mason Dr. That section is to be
continued west some 7 kilometres to Woodbine Ave.
To build the first phase of the 16th Ave. section, a tunnel
had to be burrowed as deep as 50 metres into the ground to
make way for the 2.7-metre-diameter concrete pipe — big enough
to drive a car through. Millions of litres of groundwater had
to be pumped out and discharged into streams and storm sewers
so tunnelling could be done safely.
Problems began surfacing early in 2002, when wells several
kilometres from the site began to dry up. As work continued
and millions more litres of water were sucked from aquifers —
underground lakes and rivers — the area of impact spread.
Within months, rural Markham residents living north of
Major Mackenzie Dr. began complaining about well levels
dropping dramatically and dirty water. They couldn't drink it,
cook with it or bathe in it. "They pulled the water out from
under me," says Lorne Smith, who lives on a farm on McCowan
Rd. His well went dry.
Smith figures more than 15 billion litres of water have
been drained since construction began. At least twice that
amount will be sucked out before the 16th Ave. project reaches
Woodbine, a project that will take three years to finish.
Work on that phase is on hold, but water continues to gush
from the ground to protect the integrity of the first section
of the tunnel.
"We're talking about an astronomical amount of water,"
Smith cautions. "It's insane to take so much water out of the
ground without knowing what it's doing to the environment."
The region has installed temporary holding tanks at homes
and farms with dry wells. For months, residents had to rely on
water delivered by trucks. Many said it smelled and was
undrinkable.
In May, a new well was drilled on Smith's property. Today,
there's only about a metre of water left in it. Another will
have to be drilled.
The situation is particularly galling to Smith and other
rural residents because the sewer will be of no benefit to
them.
But others see the system as a necessity and want the
bickering to end.
"I think we have to have it," says King City businessman
Jim Strachan, president of J.D. Strachan Construction Ltd.
"It's obvious from all the consultants' reports, court
decisions, environmental studies and the region that the pipe
is the only solution."
Adds Mayor Black: "The Oak Ridges Moraine is being polluted
by failing septic tanks. It is systemic and widespread. You
can go and smell it throughout town if you want to.
"It's so widespread throughout the community, it needed an
overall community system, not just septic tanks."
When water complaints began flooding in, Markham Mayor Don
Cousens and council demanded the province withhold the
region's permit to siphon more water from the ground until
residents' problems were sorted out. Without the water-taking
permit, construction could not continue on the pipe to
Woodbine Ave.
"The region really dropped the ball when it failed to deal
quickly with water problems facing our residents," the mayor
says. "We showed the region the error of its ways."
But Cousens also doesn't believe a full federal
environmental assessment is needed. And he stresses the sewer
must be built because it's a vital part of the region's
infrastructure.
Markham's demands were heard. York was ordered to prepare
mitigation plans to satisfy regulatory agencies, including the
provincial environment ministry, the federal Department of
Fisheries and Oceans and the Toronto Region Conservation
Authority, that construction of the Markham sewer wouldn't
harm watercourses or fish habitats.
The region and its consultants have been working feverishly
to come up with those plans.
Brian Denney, chief administrative officer for the
conservation authority, says a water-taking permit hasn't been
issued yet, "because we simply don't have a clear enough
understanding of the implications of de-watering."
The region, says Denney, is using a new tool that wasn't
available when the sewer project first began new tool — a
high-tech computer mapping system that simulates what's under
the ground.
One proposal being considered is piping some groundwater
from 16th Ave. north, to replenish streams dried by
dewatering. Another would see the cold groundwater heated
before it is released into streams to protect delicate aquatic
ecosystems, says Cousens.
At 10C, groundwater is colder than surface water in summer
and warmer than winter, explains Lewis Yeager, manager of
Rouge Park. Dumping water from aquifers directly into
tributaries could harm fish that are highly sensitive to
changes in habitat, he says.
Neither has ever been tried in the field, so there's no way
of knowing whether the ideas will work or what the impact
would be.
To Smith, it's all a bad joke.
"Can you imagine heaters working all summer so the water
will be warm?" he says with a laugh.
Robb says the rural water problems are persisting because
the region's studies didn't take into account the complex
"Swiss cheese" of aquifers in the ground. When water is
drained from a lower aquifer, it sets off a chain reaction in
the underground network.
A comprehensive environmental assessment would show that,
he says.
It also would find that water being pulled, at breakneck
speed, from deep in the ground is saturated with high
concentrations of minerals such as iron and cadmium, he says.
These minerals pollute streams in discharge areas like Stone
Mason Dr., where groundwater is being discharged into Robinson
Creek, which flows into the Rouge
The mineral-laden water changes the chemistry of streams
and tributaries and fish habitat.
In nature, Robb explains, minerals are filtered out over
the course of hundreds of years as groundwater slowly
percolateing to the surface.
Rocks nears the 16th Ave. discharge area are rust-coloured
from the iron in the water. Some are coated with brown, fuzzy
scum from an accumulation of minerals while gobs of goop cling
to others.
"The water looks crystal clear, but it isn't," notes Robb.
"The chemistry of water in the stream is changed and that
could kill fish."
At greatest risk, he says, is the nationally threatened
red-sided dace, a small fish found in local tributaries. Water
spewing non-stop from several pipes on the 16th Ave.
construction site is also eroding soil as it makes its way to
Robinson Creek.
"At this stage, any reasonable person would have to agree
that construction of the Big Pipe is doing serious damage to
the environment and destroying fish habitats," Robb says.
He maintains the de-watering problems could have been
avoided if the region had opted to build its sewer system
below the water table. It would have cost more than the
gravity-fed system — pumping stations and treatment plants
would be needed along the route — but it would have been an
environmentally friendly system.
Yeager agrees the Big Pipe should have come under the
scrutiny of a full environmental assessment. But even if the
project is stopped, development doesn't have to, he says.
The region could implement an "aggressive" conservation
plan and disconnect storm sewers currently linked to the York
Durham Sewer System, freeing up space and extending its
capacity by several years, he says.
"There is something other than a stop/go decision to be
made on the pipe," he suggests. "I would hope water efficiency
measures would be applied so development can continue without
lawsuits."
|