| |
|
The story of
intimidation, breach of trust and public
endangerment against residents of:
|
|
Richmond, Ontario
...a community under siege from the City of Ottawa
|
|
Now add "Blackmail"
to the list... |
Prior to August 20, 2004, this independently-owned
website displayed, (in this very spot), the logo of the Richmond Village
Association (RVA) . The logo makes the
positive statement: "a Proud Past, a Bright Future". The
city of Ottawa has now blackmailed the RVA into requesting
this website editor to remove the Village-owned logo, under city-threat of
pulling their community grant program, (funding which is given to
all other communities).
This website editor understands
that the Village battle to defend the public
interest, i.e.: to protect its citizens' own health
and attempt to have
freedom from worry of well contamination, caused by city
malfeasance, has been funded entirely from their own
public canvassing efforts.
|
| |
See
latest Richmond News and updates
at bottom of this page. |
|
|
"The Duke of Richmond must be
rolling in his grave at the disrespectful treatment Richmond
residents have been getting from the City of Ottawa"
---Overheard at Richmond Fair, 2003
|
How many ways do
the residents of Richmond have to tell the City of Ottawa that
they want new and innovative* onsite technology
used at Munster, to keep their
drinking water safe?
*as promised by
Council ...in 1998.
CLICK HERE
|

Richmond Village
Association's entry in the
Richmond Fair Parade, September 20, 2003 |
|
|
At the fair, Ted Brown,
Chairman of the Richmond Village Association, and Brian Finch
of The Friends of the Jock River, faced scores of irate residents
who are not getting answers from the City regarding their safety concerns. |
|
The City has kept residents
uninformed as long as it could, (and is still trying,
by avoiding any public presentations with opportunity for Q & A's).
As shown by the signs, people are becoming aware. |
Consider
the City's performance, to date... |
- So far, the City
has ignored the 680 petition signatures sent through the
Richmond Village Association to Mayor and Council.
It has still
not responded to the RVA.
- Richmond
residents have repeatedly requested a sit-down public
presentation meeting from the City, with an open and transparent
Question and Answer segment, to hear the City's rationale
(if any) for a pipeline. Since the City cannot offer any
rationale for a pipeline, against the safer, less expensive on-site treatment
plant option, for treating Munster's sewage ---at Munster--- the City's
only response is to ignore the requests.
- On September
23rd the City had an "Open House" without conducting
the formal presentation or public question and answer
opportunity ---that was so crucial to have, for any appearance
of openness.
Failure by the City
to fulfill this simple public request, can be viewed as a
deliberate attempt to deceive, as well as to remain
non-compliant in their obligation to properly inform the public.
- After the Open
House, residents' accounts of what they had been told by Councillor Stavinga, city engineers, and consulting engineers,
conflicted widely. It seems people were told whatever they had
to be told to pacify them at the time, and the truth in many
instances took a severe hit. People were getting completely
opposite answers ...depending on who they were talking to.
- This is the
precise reason why "Open House" formats ---alone--- are so
valueless.
| |
Even the "Stittsville News"
Editorial of September 16, 2003 called for a
presentation format of open and honest disclosure by the
City, but to no avail:
"Pipeline open house must
include presentation"
Quotes from Editorial:
"...Such
open house formats where there is no formal public
presentation plays right into the hands of the bureaucracy
and dilutes any concerns and public distress about a
project or issue."
"...Every
person who attends the open house may express similar
concerns about the project but unless a formal
presentation and question period is held, no one will ever
know."
"...Let us
have an opportunity for everyone, as a group, to hear what
the city is proposing and then have an opportunity for
everyone, as a group, to hear how people feel about the
proposal. This is the only way for the community as a
whole to deal with the issue."
"...There must be
a formal public presentation and a public question period
involved if the open house is to be an information vehicle
not only for individual private citizens but also for the
community of Goulbourn as a whole."
|
|
|
- Virtually
from the time the Region advertised its 1998
Request for Proposals
for an onsite sewage treatment facility for Munster,
back-room plotting and conspiring by our Ward-6 Councillor,
staff engineers and their consultants has been focused
entirely towards their goal of installing a hugely expensive
and risky forcemain through Richmond's shallow aquifer. As
Councillor Rainer Bloess said at the July 11, 2003
City Council
Meeting, "Something smells about this process, and
it's not just the sewage!"
-
Councillor Janet Stavinga is all too quick
to serve her own agenda, and place residents (using the
shallow aquifer) in harms way, by touting forcemains
as being "safe", "effective",
"secure and reliable".
-
Five
ruptures, to date, in the Richmond-to-Glen
Cairn forcemain prove otherwise.
|
|

|
Engineer's report
noted pipe had been leaking for "weeks or months". |
|
|
Recent
correspondence and information...
City's Open House
- September 23rd:
-
Richmond residents protest
sewer line: THE OTTAWA CITIZEN
"Dozens of Richmond residents stormed a
high school last night to raise a stink over a proposed sewage
pipeline that would cut through their community and endanger their
precious water supply."
THE OTTAWA CITIZEN: 24/09/2003 2:31:01
AM
-
Failure
to communicate effectively with residents:
Stittsville News - Editorial "The public open house at South
Carleton High School in Richmond last week was totally inadequate.
...it
is going to become a municipal election hot potato and certainly
is a glaring example of how a municipal government has failed to
be successful in communicating with residents."
Stittsville
News - Editorial, September 30, 2003
News and
Information Updates:
-
Richmond
ups ante in pipeline fight: THE OTTAWA CITIZEN
-
October 2, 2003:
"Already ensnared in a multi-million-dollar lawsuit over a proposed
sewage pipeline from Munster Hamlet to Richmond, the City of
Ottawa now faces growing opposition from the community."
THE OTTAWA
CITIZEN: 02/10/2003 8:17:50 AM
-
Costly
pipe to Munster: THE OTTAWA CITIZEN -
EDITORIAL
-
October 2, 2003:
"Munster Hamlet's wastewater is a
relatively small problem that has turned into a very large
headache for the City of Ottawa. Now the city is about to try
to bring the issue to a close by building a sewage pipeline
into Richmond. But the city's case for a pipeline is not yet
convincing."
THE OTTAWA CITIZEN - EDITORIAL: October 2, 2003
-
"It has always puzzled me what is behind the City of
Ottawa’s decision to avoid the less costly and more
environmentally friendly solution of on-site sewage treatment in
Munster."
THE OTTAWA CITIZEN - LETTER TO
THE EDITOR - Re: Costly pipe to Munster, Oct. 2, 2003
-
City spurns clear Munster
answer - THE OTTAWA CITIZEN - LETTERS
- Oct 17, 2003:

"Richmond residents are not the only ones upset by the City of
Ottawa's choice of a pipeline as the solution to the problem
of Munster's wastewater. Many Munster residents also share
their concerns and do not believe that it is the answer."
THE OTTAWA CITIZEN - LETTER TO
THE EDITOR - Re: "Richmond ups
ante in pipeline fight", Oct. 2, 2003.
Hauntingly
similar examples of
neglect of public
health risks,
between Walkerton's case, and in what the City of Ottawa is
doing to Richmond's shallow-well aquifer:
Walkerton Inquiry - info Part 1:
click here Report of the Walkerton Comission of Inquiry
Part 2:
click here
|
This will
become an all-too-familiar sight, if plans for a Munster to
Richmond forcemain are carried out.
However,
the greatest risk of all would be from hidden slow-leaks (such
as the most recent one above) polluting the aquifer ---making
this area
"A Walkerton, by design". |
|
 |
"The costs of
the Walkerton tragedy are estimated at $155 million - the
equivalent of 10 years of public health spending by the City
of Ottawa."
The Ottawa
Coalition for Public Health in the 21st Century - Ontario
Public Health Association
| |
|
"Breach of trust"
and
"Public endangerment"
In
the Walkerton case, harm befell the public because
of sloppiness on the part of the two bothers, and
lax MOE supervision.
The
Richmond case is far more "manufactured". The
mayor, supported by the ward councillor and staff
engineers have willfully chosen the highest-risk,
most expensive alternative ...in complete defiance
of expressed public safety concerns .
MOE is again asleep at the switch, as it merely
rubber-stamps the city's falsified EA process.
|
|
|
| Ottawa
Citizen, Jan. 12, 2004 |

|
|
|
The Office of the
Chief Medical Officer, City of Ottawa, (since December
2003), appears to have been stonewalling Richmond residents,
by failing to address the obvious medical health risk posed by the
planned introduction of a pressurized sewage forcemain,
through the shallow aquifer of the village.
To view a
sampling of the correspondence - click here
Please contact the Richmond Village
Association to help stop this insanity:
Send your emails to:
rvamail@sympatico.ca
Recent Letters
to this website or the print media:
"Visitor
Comments"
Nov.
16 /
03
......
Other related Visitor Comments
|
The "Chiarelli Factor"? -Actions raise more questions
than answers!
??? Why
a pipeline ??? Why detour 2 km.??? Why risk health ??? Why pay
five times more ???
Three community groups
have asked Mayor Chiarelli to explain, if his personal
rejection of Munster residents' petition request for on-site
wastewater treatment (with decommissioning of the lagoons) is
related to a family interest involving rumoured pipeline
servicing of nearby development property. Richmond residents
are at a total loss as to why the Mayor would endanger their
lives, by running an unnecessary pressurized sewer pipe
through their shallow-well aquifer, when the requested on-site
treatment plant carries no such risk, is better for the
environment and is far less costly.
VIEW LETTER
|
Thoughts to ponder...
To the City:
"To know what is right and not
to do it is the worst cowardice." -Confucius
To Richmond Residents:
"Never give in --- in nothing, great or small, large or petty
--- except to convictions
of honour and good sense.: -Winston Churchill
Re: PUBLIC MEETING,
RICHMOND - DECEMBER 9, 2003:
-
Richmond
Village Association, circulated a notice of meeting flyer to residents.
VIEW FLIER
-
POST-MORTEM REPORT
on city's failed attempt to appear credible at Richmond meeting.
-
Meeting
attendees and letter writers to city made
futile attempts to
obtain pipeline costs
-
"One-sided
meeting":
Letter to
The Ottawa Citizen -
Wednesday, December 17, 2003
At its second public information meeting about Munster Hamlet's
wastewater situation, the City of Ottawa sent its best flim-flam
team under the leadership of councillor Janet Stavinga to Richmond
last Tuesday. The intent was to put their best spin on the city's
money-wasting solution....
VIEW
Application
to the Commissioner of the
Environment for an
Investigation into the Munster Hamlet Treatment Facility Evaluation of
Alternatives undertaken by the City of Ottawa,
Pursuant
to Section 74, Environmental Bill of Rights,
filed December 15, 2003 -
VIEW
APPLICATION
Six Ottawa councillors told about problem:
The Agricultural and Rural
Affairs Committee was told, that councillors made the wrong choice, of a pipeline, because they
were not properly informed regarding risk to Richmond's shallow
aquifer, or told about the history of Richmond's frequent
(downstream) forcemain breaks.
(Link to press coverage, below.) Stittsville News - March 2, 2004:
Committee hears RVA
view of Munster pipeline project
| |
"Mr.
McKinley said that the result would be “catastrophic” if city
council ends up making the wrong decision in this matter and a
pipeline is installed. He said that, in his view, city council
has not seen all of the information that it should have seen
before reaching its decision to proceed with a sewer pipeline
rather than a stand-alone, on-site sewage treatment facility...." |
|
Letter from Councillor Glen
Brooks, to Minister of the Environment, regarding City Council
making the wrong choice based on Council NOT receiving
complete information:
CLICK HERE
| |
Significant New
Document, (February, 2004), from the Strategic Policy Branch
of the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, has immensely
positive implications for Richmond's aquifer ---simply
because it is 180o from the city's position:
"White
paper on Watershed-based Source Protection Planning"
CLICK HERE
"Without a comprehensive source water protection program, public health remains at risk."
[Correspondence
from RVA Director, to Mayor and Council, describes how
adherence to the provincial "White Paper on Watershed-based
Source Protection Planning" , (above), would ensure safety
of Richmond's water supply:
CLICK HERE]
|
|
|
|
Community members gather to find
ways to protect their shallow aquifer, drinking-water
source, from city-caused contamination:
CLICK
HERE |
|
 |
City duplicity over "concerns addressed by public":
"Alarm
Bells"
Still applies:
Sanity Check --- Are you listening to yourselves?
Trail Road Leachate Management - PLC
proceedings expose city's
over-dependence
upon the SCADA-remote sensing system to
protect residents from sewage contamination of their private
wells.
CLICK HERE

| |
URGENT
APPEAL ---to Richmond and area residents--- for
help to defend OUR OWN Health and Safety
CLICK HERE
|
|
|
| |
Eight year old Richmond
resident, Tiemen van der Horn, saw the city install the
Munster forcemain, this year, along Cockburn Street where
he lives, and has heard adults trying to figure out why the
city would take such risks with peoples lives. Entirely on
his own initiative, this is his response to the city of
Ottawa.
At
Tiemen's request, parents Tim and Wendy have forwarded
their son's letter to Mayor Bob Chiarelli and Ward
Councillor Janet Stavinga.
If an
8-year-old can connect the dots, with regard to the clear
case of public endangerment posed by the forcemain
...what is wrong with our elected representatives?
|
|
|
Richmond forcemain
breaks a SIXTH time - October 26, 2004
Trail Rd
ON-SITE leachate treatment decision, example needed for Richmond's
safety
Poor
Representative - Letter to Editor, The Ottawa Citizen, Jan. 3/05
Top environmental
lawyer speaks to Richmond residents about city's "illegal" actions
MOE tough on law-abiding rurals, easy on law-breaking cities -Free
Press Advocate
Undetected, SEVENTH,
forcemain break discovered by Richmond resident
(Feb 27/05)
Rural sewage-line solution stinks - The Ottawa Citizen -
July 31-05
|
"Drinking water sources should be protected by developing
watershed-based source protection plans."
-Walkerton Report- |
|
|